More than seven-in-ten lively science news shoppers say science and technology museums (74{e5210e2b2646e08f17e89a274273c413a1386b903ccae2616793a547f8de7c06}), science documentaries (73{e5210e2b2646e08f17e89a274273c413a1386b903ccae2616793a547f8de7c06}) and science magazines (72{e5210e2b2646e08f17e89a274273c413a1386b903ccae2616793a547f8de7c06}) get the details proper more often than not. In contrast, minorities of uninterested science information shoppers suppose each of these sources is correct more than half the time. And, simply sixteen{e5210e2b2646e08f17e89a274273c413a1386b903ccae2616793a547f8de7c06} of Americans perceive their family and friends to be accurate sources of science news, far fewer than say basic news retailers and most specialty sources get the facts right about science information more often than not.
Overall, a few third, 36{e5210e2b2646e08f17e89a274273c413a1386b903ccae2616793a547f8de7c06}, of Americans get science information a minimum of a couple of times per week, three-in-ten actively seek it out, and a smaller portion, 17{e5210e2b2646e08f17e89a274273c413a1386b903ccae2616793a547f8de7c06}, do both. At the same time, sizable shares of the general public see problems in news protection of scientific analysis stemming from the media and from researchers, as well as the general public themselves, though lower than half name any of eight potential issues as major ones. Still, when pressed to decide on, practically three-quarters of the public (73{e5210e2b2646e08f17e89a274273c413a1386b903ccae2616793a547f8de7c06}) says the way the news media cover scientific research is an even bigger problem than how researchers publish and share their findings (24{e5210e2b2646e08f17e89a274273c413a1386b903ccae2616793a547f8de7c06}). These are …